lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] proc: save decrement during lookup/readdir in /proc/$PID
Comparison for "<" works equally well as comparison for "<="
but one SUB/LEA is saved (no, it is not optimised away, at least here).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
---

fs/proc/base.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2412,14 +2412,14 @@ static struct dentry *proc_pident_lookup(struct inode *dir,
* Yes, it does not scale. And it should not. Don't add
* new entries into /proc/<tgid>/ without very good reasons.
*/
- last = &ents[nents - 1];
- for (p = ents; p <= last; p++) {
+ last = &ents[nents];
+ for (p = ents; p < last; p++) {
if (p->len != dentry->d_name.len)
continue;
if (!memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, p->name, p->len))
break;
}
- if (p > last)
+ if (p >= last)
goto out;

error = proc_pident_instantiate(dir, dentry, task, p);
@@ -2444,7 +2444,7 @@ static int proc_pident_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx,
if (ctx->pos >= nents + 2)
goto out;

- for (p = ents + (ctx->pos - 2); p <= ents + nents - 1; p++) {
+ for (p = ents + (ctx->pos - 2); p < ents + nents; p++) {
if (!proc_fill_cache(file, ctx, p->name, p->len,
proc_pident_instantiate, task, p))
break;
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-22 18:52    [W:0.027 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site