lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the integrity tree with the vfs tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the integrity tree got a conflict in:

security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c

between commit:

3bc8f29b149e ("new helper: memdup_user_nul()")

from the vfs tree and commit:

6427e6c71c8b ("ima: ima_write_policy() limit locking")

from the integrity tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index a185b6f2f390,f355231997b4..000000000000
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@@ -277,13 -272,25 +272,20 @@@ static ssize_t ima_write_policy(struct
if (*ppos != 0)
goto out;

- result = -ENOMEM;
- data = kmalloc(datalen + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!data)
+ data = memdup_user_nul(buf, datalen);
+ if (IS_ERR(data)) {
+ result = PTR_ERR(data);
goto out;
-
- *(data + datalen) = '\0';
-
- result = -EFAULT;
- if (copy_from_user(data, buf, datalen))
- goto out_free;
+ }

+ result = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ima_write_mutex);
+ if (result < 0)
+ goto out_free;
result = ima_parse_add_rule(data);
+ mutex_unlock(&ima_write_mutex);
+
+ out_free:
+ kfree(data);
out:
if (result < 0)
valid_policy = 0;


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-04 04:01    [W:0.105 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site