lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/device-tree: bindings for DSP cores/clusters for Freescale SOCs
From
Date
On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 23:46 +0530, Poonam Aggrwal wrote:
> From: poonam aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
>
> Device Tree Bindings for DSP CPU clusters and DSP CPUs for Freescale PowerPC
> SOCs which have DSP CPUs in addition to PowerPC CPUs.
> For example B4860 has 3 DSP clusters which have 2 SC3900 cores each.
>
> Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
> ---
> - based of: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> branch master
>
> This patch was sent earlier and some comments were received. Some have been
> taken care; others we can further discuss. Apologize for not following up
> on them in time.
> .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt | 78
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-
> cpus.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6d901ef
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/dsp-cpus.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> +===================================================================
> +Binding for DSP CPU clusters and DSP CPUs for Freescale SOCs which
> +have DSP CPUs in addition to PowerPC cpus.
> +Copyright 2013 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
> +
> +Power Architecture CPUs in Freescale SOCs are represented in device trees
> as
> +per the definition in ePAPR.
> +
> +Required properties for DSP CPU cluster:
> +- compatible : should be "fsl,sc3900-cluster".
> +- reg : should contain the cluster index
> +
> +Required properties for DSP CPU:
> +- compatible : should be "fsl,sc3900".
> +- reg : should contain index of DSP CPU within the DSP clsuter.
> +- next-level-cache : should point to the phandle of the next-level L2
> cache.

Why is the dsp-clusters container only shown in the example, not the binding
itself?

-Scott



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-20 02:41    [W:0.090 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site