Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:08:54 +0200 |
| |
On 02/07/2015 15:17, Eric Auger wrote: > + void (*stop_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); > + void (*resume_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
Also, can you call these just "stop"/"resume" ...
> + void (*add_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *, > + struct irq_bypass_consumer *); > + void (*del_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *, > + struct irq_bypass_consumer *); > }; > > struct irq_bypass_consumer { > struct list_head node; > void *token; > - void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); > - void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); > + unsigned int gsi; /* the guest gsi */ > + struct kvm *kvm; > + void (*stop_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *); > + void (*resume_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
... and same here? The KVM functions could be named
- kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer - kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer - kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop - kvm_arch_irq_bypass_resume
Paolo
| |