Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:20:15 +0200 |
| |
On 03/07/2015 15:12, Eric Auger wrote: >> > Linux IRQ and active should be okay. As to the vfio_device handle, you >> > should link it from the vfio_platform_device instead. And for the >> > vfio_platform_device, you can link it from the vfio_platform_irq instead. > For this last one, I don't think this is achievable since if I store the > vfio_platform_irq in the opaque, it matches irqs[i] of > vfio_platform_device and I don't have any mean to retrieve "i" when > calling container_of.
Right, notice I said "link it":
struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer); struct vfio_platform_device *vpdev = irq->vpdev; struct vfio_device *vdev = vpdev->vdev;
Would this be okay?
Paolo
| |