| Date | Wed, 24 Jun 2015 07:58:18 -0700 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.0 077/105] drm/i915: Dont skip request retirement if the active list is empty |
| |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:29:13AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > 4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > The commit to be backported is already reverted in upstream, and I just > got an email from you backporting the revert as well... would be best to > *not* backport either of these: > > commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5 > Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300 > > drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty > > commit 245ec9d85696c3e539b23e210f248698b478379c > Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > Date: Mon Jun 15 12:59:37 2015 +0300 > > Revert "drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty" > > I only marked the revert cc: stable because the original was too.
This patch is now in 4.0 so what do I suggest I do? Just take these as well?
confused,
greg k-h
|