lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Subject[PATCH 4.0 064/105] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
    Date
    4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

    ------------------

    From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>

    commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.

    The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
    so correct it.

    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com

    Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
    Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

    ---
    kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

    --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
    +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
    @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_

    if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
    struct sched_param param = {
    - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
    + .sched_priority = producer_fifo
    };
    sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
    } else

    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-06-19 23:41    [W:4.166 / U:0.604 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site