lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V7 3/6] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 03:07:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 04:07:47AM -0400, Kan Liang wrote:
> > From: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
> > +static void perf_log_lost(struct perf_event *event)
> > +{
> > + struct perf_output_handle handle;
> > + struct perf_sample_data sample;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + struct {
> > + struct perf_event_header header;
> > + u64 id;
> > + u64 lost;
> > + } lost_event = {
> > + .header = {
> > + .type = PERF_RECORD_LOST,
> > + .misc = 0,
> > + .size = sizeof(lost_event),
> > + },
> > + .id = event->id,
> > + .lost = 1,
> > + };
> > +
> > + perf_event_header__init_id(&lost_event.header, &sample, event);
> > +
> > + ret = perf_output_begin(&handle, event,
> > + lost_event.header.size);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + perf_output_put(&handle, lost_event);
> > + perf_event__output_id_sample(event, &handle, &sample);
> > + perf_output_end(&handle);
> > +}
>
> RECORDs are generic, and should live in the core code.
>
> Also, you should introduce this RECORD in a separate patch.

On that, this is lacking a RECORD definition in
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:perf_event_type


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-05 16:01    [W:0.179 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site