Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:44:27 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 4/4] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add some references |
| |
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote: > > + CPUs, with the first M - 1 tasks having a small worst case execution time > > + WCET_i=e and period equal to relative deadline P_i=D_i=P-1. The last task > > Normally, 'e' is used to denote an _arbitrarily_ small value, and I suspect > that this is indeed the case here as well (you're going to describe > Dhall's effect, right?). Perhaps make that point explicit? > > T_i = {P_i, e, P_i}
We're talking about \epsilon here, right? Is it customary to use a regular 'e' in CS literature for that?
| |