Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:11:25 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 4/4] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add some references |
| |
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:08:36PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote: > On 04/09/2015 11:44 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote: > >>>+ CPUs, with the first M - 1 tasks having a small worst case execution time > >>>+ WCET_i=e and period equal to relative deadline P_i=D_i=P-1. The last task > >> > >>Normally, 'e' is used to denote an _arbitrarily_ small value, and I suspect > >>that this is indeed the case here as well (you're going to describe > >>Dhall's effect, right?). Perhaps make that point explicit? > >> > >> T_i = {P_i, e, P_i} > > > >We're talking about \epsilon here, right? > Right. I used "e" to make the thing more readable in a simple text document. > > >Is it customary to use a regular 'e' in CS literature for that? > I do not know... I just wanted to use one single character, and to avoid the "\" > (which only makes sense to people using latex :) > > But if you want I can use "epsilon" or "\epsilon"... Let me know
I'm fine either way, its just my math/physics brain piping up.
| |