Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Fix seq_putc() to be consistent with seq_puts() | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:08:01 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 16:47 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:41:22PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Hmm, this inconsistency seems to be in more functions. I would divide > > it into three categories: [] > No. _Any_ caller that decides to report that error to its caller is fucking > broken. We had some cases like that. [] > And let's make seq_printf and friends return void. Any breakage we miss > on grep will be caught by compiler. Enough is enough.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/11/8
| |