lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: fix checkpatch error/warning in r819xU_phy.c
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:18:40PM +0530, sanjeev sharma wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:34:18AM +0530, sanjeev sharma wrote:
> > > From: sanjeevs1 <sanjeev_sharma@mentor.com>
> > ^^^^^^^^^
> > No.
> >
> > >
> > > This is a patch to the r819xU_phy.c file that fixes up all the
> > Error/Warning found by the checkpatch.pl tool
> >
> > Split it into one thing per patch.
> >
>
> you mean to say Error and Warning should be fixed in separate patches ?

patch 1: remove useless returns
patch 2: too long lines
patch 3: fix sleep ranges
etc.

> > > /* TODO: we should not delay such a long time. Ask for help from
> > SD3 */
> > > - usleep_range(1000, 1000);
> > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> >
> > No.
> >
> > usleep_range(1000, 1001);
> Above could be best fit to resolve the checkpatch error because
> usleep_range() shouldn't use min ==max args; what you would suggest ?

Just leave it alone until someone who knows the answer and has the
hardware can change it.

> > Adapter->HalFunc.LedControlHandler(Adapter, LED_CTL_NO_LINK);
> > > + Adapter->HalFunc.LedControlHandler
> > > + (Adapter, LED_CTL_NO_LINK);
> >
> > The original was more readable.
> >
> Don't we need to focus on Warning rather then readability ?

No. Readability first.

regards,
dan carpenter



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-08 12:41    [W:0.172 / U:12.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site