lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hwmon, k10temp: Add support for AMD F15h M60h processor
On 07/15/2014 12:41 AM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:21:51PM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>>> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:23:08PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>>>>> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 0x60) {
>>>>> + pci_bus_write_config_dword(pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0),
>>>>> + NB_SMU_IND_ADDR, IND_ADDR_OFFSET);
>>>>> + pci_bus_read_config_dword(pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0),
>>>>> + NB_SMU_IND_DATA, &regval);
>>>
>>> How do you prevent races with any other code that accesses some indirect
>>> register?
>>>
>> I just wanted to ask exactly the same question. I think this will need
>> locking.
>
> If there actually is any other code; these indirect SMU registers appear
> to be mostly undocumented and to be intended to be used by the BIOS.
> (Which makes me wonder why the temperature sensor was moved there.)
>
Scary. Does that mean there is a chance they may get used through ACPI ?

> Anyway, if a lock is needed, it looks as if it could go into a helper
> function such as "amd_nb_smu_ind_read()" in arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c.
>
Yes, something like that.

Guenter



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-15 14:21    [W:0.118 / U:2.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site