| Date | Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:18:57 -0700 | From | Shuah Khan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/99] 3.4.83-stable review |
| |
On 03/08/2014 01:50 PM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Sat, 08 Mar 2014 09:10:00 -0800, > Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> On 03/08/2014 08:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 06:35:52AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 03/08/2014 01:47 AM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: >>>>> At Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:06:56 -0800, >>>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.83 release. >>>>>> There are 99 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>>> let me know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Responses should be made by Mon Mar 10 01:05:53 UTC 2014. >>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>>> This kernel passed my test. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Same here. >>>> >>>> Built results: >>>> total: 119 pass: 97 skipped: 18 fail: 4 >>>> >>>> qemu tests all passed. >>>> >>>> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. >>> >>> Thanks to both of you for testing this, much appreciated. >>> >> >> You are welcome. >> >> Can you possibly add me to the cc: of your introductory e-mail >> announcing new stable releases ? Sometimes it seems to get lost >> and isn't available on any of the 'common' archives (this one >> did not make it to lkml, for example, and many of the individual >> mails didn't make it into the stable mailing list at gmane). > > Me too. >
Compile tests and boot tests passed on all my test systems. No dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.
I have a similar request for cc. The first message seems to get lost and messages don't get threaded correctly. Could you please cc me on the of your introductory e-mail.
thanks, -- Shuah
-- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658
|