lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH V2 16/16] hrtimer: use base->hres_active directly instead of hrtimer_hres_active()
Date
use base->hres_active directly when we already have a pointer to base instead of
calling hrtimer_hres_active(). As that would lead to:

__this_cpu_read(hrtimer_bases.hres_active)

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
V1->V2: Removed few entries as hres_active isn't available if
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS isn't enabled.

kernel/hrtimer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index 83e5f2d..9e18145 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void __remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer, unsigned long newstate,

#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
/* Reprogram the clock event device. if enabled */
- if (reprogram && hrtimer_hres_active() &&
+ if (reprogram && base->cpu_base->hres_active &&
&timer->node == timerqueue_getnext(&base->active)) {
ktime_t expires;

--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-28 14:21    [W:0.149 / U:9.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site