Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | [PATCH V2 16/16] hrtimer: use base->hres_active directly instead of hrtimer_hres_active() | Date | Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:56:49 +0530 |
| |
use base->hres_active directly when we already have a pointer to base instead of calling hrtimer_hres_active(). As that would lead to:
__this_cpu_read(hrtimer_bases.hres_active)
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- V1->V2: Removed few entries as hres_active isn't available if CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS isn't enabled.
kernel/hrtimer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c index 83e5f2d..9e18145 100644 --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void __remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer, unsigned long newstate, #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS /* Reprogram the clock event device. if enabled */ - if (reprogram && hrtimer_hres_active() && + if (reprogram && base->cpu_base->hres_active && &timer->node == timerqueue_getnext(&base->active)) { ktime_t expires; -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
| |