lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/16] timers/hrtimers: Minor cleanups: Part II
From
On 31 March 2014 19:08, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> And those cleanups make the compiler generate worse code at least on
> x86_64:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 7475 554 0 8029 1f5d kernel/hrtimer.o
> 7706 554 0 8260 2044 kernel/hrtimer.o
>
> So just removing parameters and return values because you can get the
> same information from a datastructure is not necessarily a good thing.

Hmm.. Nice.

Okay, I will have another look at patches and do this kind of investigation
before sending it next time :) Its been fun going through these frameworks.

How do you want to proceed now? I mean, you will take the other patches
(which don't play with function parameters) as is or want me to send a single
unified patchset with all the pending patches that I have?

Thanks for your support :)

--
viresh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-31 17:21    [W:0.163 / U:42.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site