Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 08 Jan 2014 05:56:21 -0800 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/144] 3.12.7-stable review |
| |
On 01/07/2014 02:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 01/07/2014 12:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> On 01/06/2014 03:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.7 release. >>>> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan 8 22:37:25 UTC 2014. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>> >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.7-rc1.gz >>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> greg k-h >>> >>> Patches testing - passed >>> Compile testing - passed >>> Boot testing - passed >>> dmesg regression testing - passed >>> >>> Test systems >>> >>> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) >>> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics >>> Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 >>> >>> Detailed test status >>> >>> Patches applied cleanly >>> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this >>> release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. >> >> Just in time for me to do a -rc2 release for this, and the 3.10 -rc1 >> announcement, sorry :) >> > > 3.10.26-rc2 and 3.12.7-rc2 are looking good on all my 3 test systems. No dmesg regressions. > Same here.
Guenter
| |