lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.12 000/144] 3.12.7-stable review
On 01/07/2014 02:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 12:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2014 03:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.7 release.
>>>> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan 8 22:37:25 UTC 2014.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.7-rc1.gz
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> Patches testing - passed
>>> Compile testing - passed
>>> Boot testing - passed
>>> dmesg regression testing - passed
>>>
>>> Test systems
>>>
>>> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later)
>>> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
>>> Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400
>>>
>>> Detailed test status
>>>
>>> Patches applied cleanly
>>> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this
>>> release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.
>>
>> Just in time for me to do a -rc2 release for this, and the 3.10 -rc1
>> announcement, sorry :)
>>
>
> 3.10.26-rc2 and 3.12.7-rc2 are looking good on all my 3 test systems. No dmesg regressions.
>
Same here.

Guenter




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-08 17:21    [W:0.210 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site