Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:00:12 -0700 | From | Shuah Khan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/144] 3.12.7-stable review |
| |
On 01/07/2014 12:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 01/06/2014 03:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.7 release. >>> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan 8 22:37:25 UTC 2014. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.7-rc1.gz >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> Patches testing - passed >> Compile testing - passed >> Boot testing - passed >> dmesg regression testing - passed >> >> Test systems >> >> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) >> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics >> Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 >> >> Detailed test status >> >> Patches applied cleanly >> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this >> release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. > > Just in time for me to do a -rc2 release for this, and the 3.10 -rc1 > announcement, sorry :) >
3.10.26-rc2 and 3.12.7-rc2 are looking good on all my 3 test systems. No dmesg regressions.
-- Shuah
-- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658
| |