lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: Make the memory barrier test noisier
From
Date
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 16:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:14:17AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra prefers that comments be required near uses
> > of memory barriers.
> >
> > Change the message level for memory barrier uses from a
> > --strict test only to a normal WARN so it's always emitted.
> >
> > This might produce false positives around insertions of
> > memory barriers when a comment is outside the patch context
> > block.
>
> One would argue that in that case they're too far away in any case :-)
>
> > And checkpatch is still stupid, it only looks for existence
> > of any comment, not at the comment content.
>
> Could we try and alleviate this by giving a slightly more verbose
> warning?

> Maybe something like:
>
> memory barrier without comment; please refer to the pairing barrier and
> describe the ordering requirements.

That would make it seem as if all barriers are SMP no?

Maybe just refer to Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
and/or say something like "please document appropriately"




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-27 19:21    [W:0.108 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site