lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Results] [RFC PATCH v4 00/40] mm: Memory Power Management
On 9/25/2013 4:47 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Also, the changelogs don't appear to discuss one obvious downside: the
>> latency incurred in bringing a bank out of one of the low-power states
>> and back into full operation. Please do discuss and quantify that to
>> the best of your knowledge.
>
> On Sandy Bridge the memry wakeup overhead is really small. It's on by default
> in most setups today.

btw note that those kind of memory power savings are content-preserving,
so likely a whole chunk of these patches is not actually needed on SNB
(or anything else Intel sells or sold)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-26 04:01    [W:0.700 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site