[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Would an "information module" be useful?
Am 22.09.2013 22:30, schrieb Markus Elfring:
>> You can do all parsing in user space too.
> Is it questionable when a custom prefix of a boot command-line parameter can not
> be mapped to a kernel module?

In the systemd case we have to ensure that we never ever merge a module named "systemd".
It's that easy. :)

>> drivers/misc/ is a nice place do dump such things. :-)
> Is an information sink module (with corresponding data type checks) still an
> "ordinary" driver?

We have all kinds of strange modules/drivers. Usually you don't have to think whether your
module is a "ordinary" driver or not...
See drivers/misc/dummy-irq.c.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-22 22:41    [W:0.042 / U:35.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site