lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ 06/79] net: Swap ver and type in pppoe_hdr
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:39:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:16:16 -0700
>
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:14:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:55 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> > From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> >> > Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:58:28 +0100
> >> >
> >> > > I'm not so sure this is suitable for stable. It doesn't seem to be
> >> > > helpful to either userland or kernel code.
> >> > >
> >> > > In the kernel, we were checking that ver == 1 and type == 1 thus this
> >> > > wasn't hurting us.
> >> > >
> >> > > If userland does anything more with these fields then it's probably
> >> > > already working around the swapped fields. It can work with both old
> >> > > and new headers by doing:
> >> >
> >> > It's up to you, I would rather have the corrected version propagated
> >> > as soon as possible. But that's just me.
> >>
> >> Let's see what Greg thinks.
> >
> > I'm guessing that Linus's tree is also "wrong" here, correct? If so,
> > the fix that goes into that tree should also go here as well.
> >
> > Or am I confused?
>
> Linus's tree has had this change for a full release. It went into
> 3.10

But isn't this a review of the 3.10-stable series? So what is the
probme?

> It's correcting a mistake that has been there since the header
> file even existed.

Ok, then I think this should be made, fixes are good to have, right?

So, unless someone objects, I'll just keep this as-is.

thanks,

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-28 20:41    [W:1.144 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site