[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] When to push bug fixes to mainline
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:11 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > People mark stable patches that way already today with a:
> > Cc: stable <> # delay for 3.12-rc4
> > or some such wording. I take those and don't apply them until the noted
> > release happens, so you can do this if needed.
> I guess the thing is, are stable patches prone to regressions. Do we
> just do that for patches that we think are too complex and may cause
> some harm. Of course, there's the question about having a clue about
> what patches might cause harm or not.

We'd probably better switch the tag to be "# now" to imply that we don't
want to delay them, and that by default those merged prior to rc4 are all
postponed. I suspect that the switching could be mostly automated this way,
avoiding to add burden to Greg :

- if commit ID >= -rc4
move to immediate queue, it's a "critical" fix as per Linus' rules

- if Cc: stable line has "now" at the end, move to immediate queue as
the maintainer takes this reponsibility ;

- otherwise move to the next .2 queue.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-16 23:01    [W:0.098 / U:3.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site