Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:21:37 -0700 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them |
| |
Hello, Glauber.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:01:40PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > This is getting confusing for me as well, because I don't know if your > reply was targeted towards me or Michal. As for me, I am in agreement > with what you did, and I merely replied to Michal's concern and > suggestion of not warning in the special 1-st level only setups saying I > side with you.
Oh, I was replying to Michal. I thought there was behavior difference with the .use_hierarchy=0 cases that Michal was talking about but I don't think that's the case and Michal is trying to say that we shouldn't warn if the configuration behaves identical to root.use_hierarchy=1 even if it contains some .use_hierarchy=0's, which I'm fine with.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |