lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them
Hello,

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > While I respect your goal of not warning about any configuration
> > with max_level = 1, I believe the only sane configuration as soon
> > as we get any 2nd-level child is use_hierarchy = 1 for everybody.
> >
> > Everything aside from it should be warned.
>
> Defintely. And that what the above guarantess, doesn't it?

I'm getting a bit worried that I might not be fully understanding what
your concern is. Can you please elaborate what your worries are and
the transition plan that you have in your mind regarding
.use_hierarchy?

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-12 20:01    [W:0.107 / U:1.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site