Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Wanpeng Li <> | Subject | [PATCH] mm/memcg: replace inexistence move_lock_page_cgroup() by move_lock_mem_cgroup() in comment | Date | Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:28:53 +0800 |
| |
From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 3d318f6..63e36e7 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ again: return; /* * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't - * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold + * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true. */ @@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags) /* * It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while * lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup - * should take move_lock_page_cgroup(). + * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). */ move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags); } -- 1.7.5.4
| |