lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: 3.4+ tty lockdep trace
    On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
    > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    >> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:24:56 +0200
    >> Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> >
    >> > And here is the second one attached as well, so these are two
    >> > different warnings I get with the new version.
    >>
    >>
    >> I'm somewhat baffled by this one. Can lockdep be fooled by an object
    >> being freed and reallocated at the same address, Is there any markup
    >> that should be present to avoid that ?
    >
    > Sasha,
    >
    > Did you apply Ming's second patch. His first patch (the one referenced
    > in the email) didn't have the unlock fixup.

    Nope, I just got the first one.

    What's the right patchset to use atm? I know about these patches from
    Ming, and I see Alan sent out two patches yesterday. Which ones should
    I use for testing?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-25 10:41    [W:0.041 / U:0.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site