lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: 3.4+ tty lockdep trace
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:24:56 +0200
>> Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > And here is the second one attached as well, so these are two
>> > different warnings I get with the new version.
>>
>>
>> I'm somewhat baffled by this one. Can lockdep be fooled by an object
>> being freed and reallocated at the same address, Is there any markup
>> that should be present to avoid that ?
>
> Sasha,
>
> Did you apply Ming's second patch. His first patch (the one referenced
> in the email) didn't have the unlock fixup.

Nope, I just got the first one.

What's the right patchset to use atm? I know about these patches from
Ming, and I see Alan sent out two patches yesterday. Which ones should
I use for testing?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-25 10:41    [W:0.937 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean