lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: 3.4+ tty lockdep trace
    From
    On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
    >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    >>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:24:56 +0200
    >>> Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>> >
    >>> > And here is the second one attached as well, so these are two
    >>> > different warnings I get with the new version.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> I'm somewhat baffled by this one. Can lockdep be fooled by an object
    >>> being freed and reallocated at the same address, Is there any markup
    >>> that should be present to avoid that ?
    >>
    >> Sasha,
    >>
    >> Did you apply Ming's second patch. His first patch (the one referenced
    >> in the email) didn't have the unlock fixup.
    >
    > Nope, I just got the first one.
    >
    > What's the right patchset to use atm? I know about these patches from
    > Ming, and I see Alan sent out two patches yesterday. Which ones should
    > I use for testing?

    You can try to apply my 2nd patch against Alan's two patches for the tests.


    Thanks,
    --
    Ming Lei


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-25 10:41    [W:0.040 / U:178.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site