lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: Suggest pr_<level> over printk(KERN_<LEVEL>
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:01:44 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:55:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > mm... probably. It's not a thing I ever bother mentioning in review,
> > but I guess pr_foo() is a bit denser, and doing the same thing in two
> > different ways is always an irritant.
>
> Sure but if a particular kernel file or subsystem is _not_ using
> pr_foo(), having a checkpatch which tries to force everyone to use
> pr_foo() is going to be really annoying to me as a maintainer...
>

Yes, that's what I fear. That's why I'm testing it...


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-13 23:17    [W:0.107 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site