lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH 4/4] signal: zap_pid_ns_processes: s/SEND_SIG_NOINFO/SEND_SIG_FORCED/
Change zap_pid_ns_processes() to use SEND_SIG_FORCED, it looks more
clear compared to SEND_SIG_NOINFO which relies on from_ancestor_ns
logic send_signal().

It is also more effecient if we need to kill a lot of tasks because
it doesn't alloc sigqueue.

While at it, add the __fatal_signal_pending(task) check as a minor
optimization.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/pid_namespace.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
index a896839..17b2328 100644
--- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -168,13 +168,9 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
while (nr > 0) {
rcu_read_lock();

- /*
- * Any nested-container's init processes won't ignore the
- * SEND_SIG_NOINFO signal, see send_signal()->si_fromuser().
- */
task = pid_task(find_vpid(nr), PIDTYPE_PID);
- if (task)
- send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, task);
+ if (task && !__fatal_signal_pending(task))
+ send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task);

rcu_read_unlock();

--
1.5.5.1



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-10 21:09    [W:0.060 / U:1.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site