lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] module: add syscall to load module from fd
On 10/18/2012 08:28 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> The goal for finit_module is to make sure we're getting what's on the
> filesystem, not an arbitrary blob, so we can reason about it for
> security policy.
>

Yes, I get that... although I'm starting to think that that might
actually be a really bad idea.

>> was confused about the functioning of the *current* init_module() system
>> call.
>>
>> Given that, I have to say I now seriously question the value of
>> finit_module(). The kernel can trivially discover if the pointed-to memory
>> area is a MAP_SHARED mmap() of a file descriptor and if so which file
>> descriptor... why can't we handle this behind the scenes?
>
> This makes me very nervous. I worry that it adds needless complexity
> (it'd be many more checks besides "is it MAP_SHARED?", like "does the
> memory region show the whole file?" "is the offset zero?" etc). Also
> are we sure the memory area would be truly be unmodifiable in the case
> where the filesystem is read-only?

You may need to check for PROT_READONLY as well.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-18 18:21    [W:0.079 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site