| Date | Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:05:23 +0200 | From | Samuel Ortiz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/16] freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly |
| |
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > Some drivers set PF_NOFREEZE in their kthread functions which is > completely unnecessary and racy - some part of freezer code doesn't > consider cases where PF_NOFREEZE is set asynchronous to freezer > operations. > > In general, there's no reason to allow setting PF_NOFREEZE explicitly. > Remove them and change the documentation to note that setting > PF_NOFREEZE directly isn't allowed.
For the mfd parts:
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cheers, Samuel.
-- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
|