Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:28:08 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] Change CPUACCT to default n | From | Balbir Singh <> |
| |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote: > On 11/16/2011 09:52 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >> >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:51:27 +0530 >> Balbir Singh<bsingharora@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> On the other hand, I don't think much discussion remains for cpuacct, >>>> everyone's pretty unanimous in that they'd like to see it deprecated. >>>> By splitting this up we can close out that quickly while we figure out >>>> the >>>> best way to resolve the above. >>>> >>> >>> I'd give it a thumbs up, if we can create sched groups and provide >>> accounting without control - like we can for the memory cgroup today. >>> >> >> Isn't it possible ? >> >> Thanks, >> -Kame >> > I must say I don't really understand what exactly you propose, and how it is > different from what we have today. > > My take is that you are talking about a single cgroup in which you can have > the functionality of both cpuacct and cpu, but surrounded by knobs that > allows you to turn them off individually. > > Am I right? >
No here is what I am asking for
I don't want CPU control, just accounting, so I create the following groups
a / \ V V b c
Today, with the cpu controller, the moment I create a, b and c, they get default shares and if I put tasks, their b/w is decided by the shares, what if I don't want control, but I want to account for their time only?
Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |