[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCHv5] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api
    On 14 October 2011 20:36, Vinod Koul <> wrote:
    >> 2011/10/14 Vinod Koul <>:
    >> > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 17:21 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
    >> >> On 14 October 2011 13:02, Barry Song <> wrote:
    >> >> >
    >> >> > what if i want a cyclic interleaved transfer? i think the cyclic
    >> >> > interleaved transfer is what i want for audio dma.
    >> >> >
    >> >> ... we need to restore 'bool frm_irq' and add new 'bool cyclic' that
    >> >> would replay the transfer(i.e, reset dma-pointers to src_start & dst_start)
    >> >> after 'numf' frames have been transferred.
    >> > I was thinking more on lines to have this conveyed thru a flag.
    >> >
    >> > Anyway I plan to work on merging device_prep_slave_sg and
    >> > device_prep_cyclic to single API. Think more of device_prep_cyclic as
    >> > special case with sg length one and flag to tell dmac its cyclic.
    >> >
    >> > Similarly here we could use/define this flag to say this transfer is
    >> > also cyclic in nature and dmac then reloads the list again.
    >> > That way any prep can be made cyclic in nature by just using this flag.
    >> >
    >> > @Barry: Why would you need to use interleaved API for audio?
    >> At first, audio dma is typically cyclic. if no underflow and overflow
    >> happens, it will always be running. underflow and overflow will
    >> trigger the cyclic dma termination.
    > Yes and you terminate dma. Then prepare will be called again and you
    > setup DMA again and on trigger start you start DMA again.
    > No need for interleaving in this case.
    >> in case audio PCM data is interleaved and saved in dma buffer  as below:
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)  left (2B)  right (2B)   left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)  left (2B)  right (2B)   left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)  left (2B)  right (2B)   left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)  left (2B)  right (2B)   left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> left (2B)  right (2B)
    >> ,,,,
    >> and some hardwares need two seperate dma channels to tranfer left and
    >> right audio channel.
    >> For 1st and 2nd dma channel, they want dma address increases 4bytes
    >> and transfer 2bytes every line.
    >> so it looks to me like a cyclic interleaved dma.
    > Hmmm, do we have sound cards which use this?
    > Nevertheless for this kind of transfers we would need interleaved cyclic
    > DMA as well, Do you have such usage? Can you tell me which codec
    > requires this?
    My proposed 'frm_irq' and 'cyclic' flags are for such requirements.

    Consider a 5.1chan I2S controller that employs 3 dma-channels
    each transferring 2 audio-channels to 3 three FIFOs. And the
    pcm-dma driver supports SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED.
    While I worked with simple single fifo 5.1chan I2S controllers, I don't
    think such 3-fifo controllers can't exist.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-14 18:39    [W:0.023 / U:25.580 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site