lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Notes from the Boston Linux Power Management Mini-summit - August 9th, 2010
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 01:36:33AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:

> A gap:
>
> On OMAP, bus control is independent of CPU frequency control,
> so cpufreq and cpuidle don't quite fit the bill.
>
> Perhaps a "bus-idle" analogous to "cpu-idle" may be appropriate?

FWIW this applies to a bunch of other embedded processors too - OMAP
isn't particularly unique here, though it's one of the furthest along in
terms of exploting this in mainline Linux.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-16 16:51    [W:0.035 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site