Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:49:14 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] Notes from the Boston Linux Power Management Mini-summit - August 9th, 2010 |
| |
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 01:36:33AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> A gap: > > On OMAP, bus control is independent of CPU frequency control, > so cpufreq and cpuidle don't quite fit the bill. > > Perhaps a "bus-idle" analogous to "cpu-idle" may be appropriate?
FWIW this applies to a bunch of other embedded processors too - OMAP isn't particularly unique here, though it's one of the furthest along in terms of exploting this in mainline Linux.
| |