Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH RESEND] Fix /proc/softirqs file formatting | From | Davidlohr Bueso <> | Date | Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:06:49 -0400 |
| |
Hi,
The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit neater.
Currently: CPU0 HI: 0 TIMER: 599792 NET_TX: 2 NET_RX: 6 BLOCK: 80807 BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 TASKLET: 20012 SCHED: 0 HRTIMER: 63 RCU: 619279
With patch: CPU0 HI: 0 TIMER: 585582 NET_TX: 2 NET_RX: 6 BLOCK: 80320 BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 TASKLET: 19287 SCHED: 0 HRTIMER: 62 RCU: 604441
Thanks, Davidlohr
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org> --- fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c index 1807c24..3799473 100644 --- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c +++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v) { int i, j; - seq_printf(p, " "); + seq_printf(p, " "); for_each_possible_cpu(i) seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i); seq_printf(p, "\n"); for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) { - seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]); + seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]); for_each_possible_cpu(j) seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j)); seq_printf(p, "\n"); -- 1.7.0.4
| |