Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 May 2010 14:07:24 -0700 | From | Matt Helsley <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments |
| |
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote: > > > > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote: > > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> > > >> > > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail > > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the > > >> power management freezer code. > > > > > > I guess these three patches are for me. > > > > > > Do you want me to handle them? > > > > Yes, please, that would be great. > > However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't > appear to be margeable at this point. Is this correct?
Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point.
Cheers, -Matt Helsley
| |