lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> >
> > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
> > >>
> > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
> > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
> > >> power management freezer code.
> > >
> > > I guess these three patches are for me.
> > >
> > > Do you want me to handle them?
> >
> > Yes, please, that would be great.
>
> However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't
> appear to be margeable at this point. Is this correct?

Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only
checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I
think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point.

Cheers,
-Matt Helsley


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-12 10:15    [W:0.089 / U:1.564 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site