lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments
    Date
    On Monday 10 May 2010, Matt Helsley wrote:
    > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
    > > >
    > > > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
    > > > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
    > > > >>
    > > > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
    > > > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
    > > > >> power management freezer code.
    > > > >
    > > > > I guess these three patches are for me.
    > > > >
    > > > > Do you want me to handle them?
    > > >
    > > > Yes, please, that would be great.
    > >
    > > However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't
    > > appear to be margeable at this point. Is this correct?
    >
    > Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only
    > checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I
    > think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point.

    OK, so I'm going to take patch 15 only for the upcoming merge window.

    Thanks,
    Rafael


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-12 11:27    [W:4.137 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site