Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:22:29 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: __weak vs ifdef |
| |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Grant Likely wrote: > > Question. If I use this pattern, and use the __weak attribute on core > code functions wrapped with a #ifndef, then how does it mesh with > EXPORT_SYMBOL*() statements?
You can't. Or at least not the traditional way, which is to put the EXPORT_SYMBOL next to the definition of what gets exported.
If you use __weak, you need to make sure that all users of said weak symbol are in another file. There are some compiler and/or binutils bugs with using weak symbols in the same translation unit, so the rule is that a weak definition hes to be somewhere else from the use - including EXPORT_SYMBOL.
> I also assume that at the core code site, the EXPORT_SYMBOL() must > appear inside the #ifndef block so that a #define override doesn't > break things. Correct?
See above. You can't put it inside the _same_ #ifndef block. You'd have to put it in a different file, but yes, inside an ifndef. At which point the linker will just pick the right definition.
However, in general, this probably gets ugly enough that the whole __weak thing is not great for exported stuff. It's likely mostly useful for some "generic" arch functionality that is always compiled in.
Linus
| |