Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:33:34 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] ZERO PAGE again v4. |
| |
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:12:45 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:51:37 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:01:34 +0900 > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Rebased onto mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-07-15-20-57. > > > And modifeied to make vm_normal_page() eat FOLL_NOZERO, directly. > > > > > > Any comments ? > > > > > > > A week passed since I posted this. > > I'm catching up at a rate of 2.5 days per day. Am presently up to July > 16. I never know whether to work through it forwards or in reverse. > > Geeze you guys send a lot of stuff. Stop writing new code and go fix > some bugs! > In these months, I myself don't write any new feature. I'm now in stablization stage. (ZERO_PAGE is not new feature in my point of view.)
Remainig big one is Direce-I/O v.s. fork() fix.
> > It's no problem to keep updating this > > and post again. But if anyone have concerns, please notify me. > > I'll reduce CC: list in the next post. > > ok... > I'll postpone v5 until the next week.
Thank you for your efforts.
BTW, when I post new version, should I send a reply to old version to say "this version is obsolete" ? Can it make your work easier ? like following.
Re:[PATCH][Obsolete] new version weill come (Was.....)
I tend to update patches until v5 or more until merged.
Regards, -Kame
| |