Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:33:16 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jesper Juhl <> | Subject | Re: Should I choose SLOW_WORK? |
| |
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I am newly presented with > > > > Enable slow work thread pool (SLOW_WORK) [N/y/?] (NEW) ? > > > > The slow work thread pool provides a number of dynamically allocated > > threads that can be used by the kernel to perform operations that > > take a relatively long time. > > > > An example of this would be CacheFiles doing a path lookup followed > > by a series of mkdirs and a create call, all of which have to touch > > disk. > > > However, this does not tell me whether I need or want this. > > And, why must the user make this choice at all? Surely it can be > auto-selected, if cachefs is enabled? At a minimum, hide this under > CONFIG_EMBEDDED or whatnot, so that most users don't see this choice, IMO. >
I very much agree. I was confused by that option as well when I first saw it and the help text didn't really help much in determining if I wanted it or not. If it's something that's generally useful, the kernel should just enable/use it. If other things depend on it they should auto-select it.
-- Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
| |