Messages in this thread | | | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Subject | Re: revert "config FS_JOURNAL_INFO" | Date | Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:51:49 +0900 |
| |
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> writes:
> On 12/18/09, Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote: >> So we never allow to make memory usage small with providing an option >> to remove unused area, right? > > We certainly allow this if it results in zero loss in functionality. > >> If I want to reduce memory usage by this way, should I keep >> this kind of patches out of tree? > > Certainly nobody can prohibit you from keeping patch out of tree. > But if you want something mainlinable, moving ->journal_info > to fs-specific data structures should do the trick. Or something.
Why doesn't this use EMBEDDED?
I.e.
boot "xxx" if EMBEDDED default y
style Kconfig.
Only reason which seems reasonable is "this is done only for one pointer on task_struct". This reason seems something like "You care, but I don't care it". And, other reasons is *normal* situation on EMBEDDED, right?
Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
| |