Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:25:51 +0200 | Subject | Re: revert "config FS_JOURNAL_INFO" | From | Alexey Dobriyan <> |
| |
On 12/18/09, Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote: > So we never allow to make memory usage small with providing an option > to remove unused area, right?
We certainly allow this if it results in zero loss in functionality.
> If I want to reduce memory usage by this way, should I keep > this kind of patches out of tree?
Certainly nobody can prohibit you from keeping patch out of tree. But if you want something mainlinable, moving ->journal_info to fs-specific data structures should do the trick. Or something.
| |