lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: revert "config FS_JOURNAL_INFO"
From
On 12/18/09, Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> So we never allow to make memory usage small with providing an option
> to remove unused area, right?

We certainly allow this if it results in zero loss in functionality.

> If I want to reduce memory usage by this way, should I keep
> this kind of patches out of tree?

Certainly nobody can prohibit you from keeping patch out of tree.
But if you want something mainlinable, moving ->journal_info
to fs-specific data structures should do the trick. Or something.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-18 08:29    [W:0.093 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site