Messages in this thread | | | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] warn about shared irqs requesting IRQF_DISABLED registered with setup_irq | Date | Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:13:13 -0800 |
| |
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What about analysing the code and verifying that the setup order is > correct ?
Better to not care too much about setup order. Sometimes it's unavoidable -- X initializes before Y "or else..." -- but the patch I saw was just reporting goofage better.
> Adding save/restore_irq just because you have no clue what the code > does is utter nonsense.
Absolutely. If that helps, find and fix the real bug.
| |