lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Subjectvirtual vs physical addresses to cache functions
Date
From
Maybe this is a dumb question...

I believe that the kernel expects virtual addresses to be passed to the
defined cache functions across all architectures. Looking at PowerPC
and Blackfin confirm this I think.

Can someone confirm this or point to where it's documented as I have dug
for it without finding any specific details?

Thanks,
John

This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-29 17:31    [W:1.513 / U:0.968 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site