Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add a never optimized away pr_dbg for printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt)...) | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:44:12 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 21:28 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > The pr_dbg_* variations seem reasonable if the current pr_debug() were > changed to pr_dbg().
I think that's unlikely to happen.
> this discussion is irrelevant if there > are no current use cases (in which case the patch is pointless).
Yeah, right. It's alway irrelevant to add new facilities when where are no current use cases.
I sent a 21 deep patchset over a week ago. http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/4/198
| |