Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:53:20 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] NET: fix wrong English expression in comments | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:39:18 +0000
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:05 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > > > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct inet_bind_bucket; > > > struct inet_timewait_sock { > > > /* > > > * Now struct sock also uses sock_common, so please just > > > - * don't add nothing before this first member (__tw_common) --acme > > > + * don't add anything before this first member (__tw_common) --acme > > > > They are the same meaning... > > A double-negative can be an informal way of reinforcing a negative, but > can sometimes mean the positive. So this change would remove a minor > ambiguity. However I think it should be clear that it is not compulsory > to add new members to the structure. ;-)
After all of this discussion, I think I'm going to keep this comment as-is. :-)
| |