lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] NET: fix wrong English expression in comments
    From
    The patch will make sense for some people. I was puzzled about the
    double-negative for quite a while.

    On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:53 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
    > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
    > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:39:18 +0000
    >
    >> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:05 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
    >> > > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct inet_bind_bucket;
    >> > > struct inet_timewait_sock {
    >> > > /*
    >> > > * Now struct sock also uses sock_common, so please just
    >> > > - * don't add nothing before this first member (__tw_common) --acme
    >> > > + * don't add anything before this first member (__tw_common) --acme
    >> >
    >> > They are the same meaning...
    >>
    >> A double-negative can be an informal way of reinforcing a negative, but
    >> can sometimes mean the positive. So this change would remove a minor
    >> ambiguity. However I think it should be clear that it is not compulsory
    >> to add new members to the structure. ;-)
    >
    > After all of this discussion, I think I'm going to keep this comment
    > as-is. :-)
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-13 07:19    [W:0.020 / U:0.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site