[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: wrong usage of __devexit_p and __exit_p
    Hello Sam,

    > > Did you check that this did not introduce any new Section mismatch warnings?
    > > We have seen several __exit annotated functions that was used from __init
    > > annotated code or even from normal code.
    > > Thus the __exit annotation was wrong in these cases.
    > I wrote in the commit logs, that the functions are only used as argument
    > to __{dev,}exit_p. There are no direct calls. (IIRC there was only one
    > exception that I checked manually.)
    Actually the case I remembered here isn't part of the series.

    > I think the __{dev,}exit_p wrappers are only used to define remove
    > callbacks, so there should be no harm.
    In the meantime I checked this:

    ~/gsrc/linux-2.6$ git diff-tree -r linus/master expsec-master | cut -f 2 | xargs grep -h -E '__(dev)?exit_p'
    .remove = __devexit_p(s3c_adc_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(s3c_pwm_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(virtblk_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(virtrng_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(stli_pciremove)
    .remove = __devexit_p(hifn_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(mpc85xx_pci_err_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(mv64x60_pci_err_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(max7301_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(bbc_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(grover_remove),
    .remove = __exit_p(pxa_camera_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(asic3_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(ilo_remove),
    .remove = __exit_p(mxcnd_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(virtnet_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(atp870u_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(megaraid_detach_one),
    .remove = __devexit_p(stex_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(jsm_remove_one),
    .remove = __devexit_p(sc26xx_driver_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(spidev_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(vhci_hcd_remove),
    .remove = __devexit_p(virtballoon_remove),

    So in the patched files __(dev)?exit_p is only used to fill struct
    members. Provided this is the only usage of the respective
    functions---and I checked that---it doesn't make sense that they don't
    live in .devexit.text (or .exit.text respectively).

    Does it make sence for you, too?

    Best regards

    Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
    Industrial Linux Solutions | |
    Peiner Strasse 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
    Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-12 21:57    [W:0.024 / U:6.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site