[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: wrong usage of __devexit_p and __exit_p
    On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 02:50:57PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
    > Hello,
    > I found several drivers that use __devexit_p and __exit_p on functions
    > that don't live in .devexit.text or .exit.text resp.
    > The impact is either that these functions use memory without being used
    > or that they don't link.
    > I send 24 patches as a reply to this mail. I choosed to move the
    > functions into the respective function instead of using the right
    > __{dev,}exit_p wrapper because it seems to me to have less impact.
    > I didn't made the effort to find out the right people to Cc: but I hope
    > that Andrew takes care of that :-)

    Did you check that this did not introduce any new Section mismatch warnings?
    We have seen several __exit annotated functions that was used from __init
    annotated code or even from normal code.
    Thus the __exit annotation was wrong in these cases.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-12 15:15    [W:0.019 / U:9.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site